"One Nation Under God"
vs.
Zionist Protocol XIV
(Assault on Religion)by
Ernesto Cienfuegos
La Voz de AztlanLos Angeles, Alta California - 6/27/2002 - (ACN) The decision by the Federal Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals to declare the Pledge of Allegiance unconstitutional because of its inclusion of the phrase "One nation under God" has created much heated debate here in Los Angeles. The decision was made by a 3 judge panel in San Francisco by a vote of 2 to 1. The two judges that voted in favor are Judge Alfred T. Goodwin and Judge Stephen Reinhardt. The dissenting vote was cast by Judge Ferdinand F. Fernandez, a native Alta Californian.
What political forces are behind "taking God" totally out of the public schools? An analysis of the backgrounds of the two judges behind the vote and of Michael A. Newdow who filed as plaintiff, originally in Florida, will provide some clues.
Firstly, lets analyze the background of Judge Stephen Reinhardt, one of the two judges voting in favor. Well its just happens that Judge Reinhardt is married to Jewess Ramona Ripston who is the Executive Director of the ACLU of Southern California. Now, all well informed Americans should know what the ACLU stands for. The ACLU National Board of Directors are pretty much all Jews and their headquarters are in New York City. This is the principal group in America that has spent millions in filing court cases to eliminate "prayer" in our schools but at the same time have filed case after case to defend the homosexual and lesbian lifestyles. This is the principal group that will terrorized any public school teacher that dares to utter the words "Jesus Christ" in the classroom. Starting to get the picture?
Secondly, let us analyze the background of Judge Alfred T. Goodwin. This man is known here in the Californian Mexican-American community as "El Juez Judas" because of his anti-Jesus sentiments he has demonstrated throughout his legal career. He is 78 years old. The newspaper Sacramento Bee quoted Judge Goodwin as saying, "Leading schoolchildren in a pledge that says the United States is ``one nation under God'' is as objectionable as making them say ``we are a nation `under Jesus,'"! This is a vehemently anti-Christian statement and it says that he voted for declaring the "Pledge" unconstitutional because he does not like Jesus Christ. La Voz de Aztlan believes that the whole issue is one of Jews against Christians.
As further proof, lets us analyze the background of the plaintiff Michael A. Newdow. This is not the first time that Mr. Newdow, whose mother is a Jewess, has brought a suit in federal court to "eliminate Jesus Christ" in government affairs. In May of this year U.S. District Judge Lawrence K. Karlton tossed out of court a suit to make President Bush stop mixing politics and his Christian faith. The federal court declared that the courts have no authority to restrain a president from acting in a particular fashion. Newdow built his lawsuit against Bush around a prayer delivered at the 2000 inauguration by the Rev. Franklin Graham that was based on Christian beliefs and referenced "the Lord Jesus Christ." Again, the whole issue is not about God but about Jesus Christ. The initial suit against the "One nation under God" clause was actually first brought before a federal district court in Florida. There it was striked down and Newdow decided to appeal. It looks like Newdow got some help from the Jewish ACLU because he was guided to move the case to San Francisco were the husband of Ramona Ripston of the ACLU was a judge. The results are now history.
Why was the elaborate conspiracy undertaken? Is it part and parcel of a bigger plan to weaken America morally and take it over? Regardless of the great controversy behind the authenticity of the "Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion", the pattern of this case certainly follows Protocol XIV - Assault on Religion.
Protocol XIV says:
1. When we come into our kingdom it will be undesirable for us that there should exist any other religion than ours of the One God with whom our destiny is bound up by our position as the Chosen People and through whom our same destiny is united with the destinies of the world. We must therefore sweep away all other forms of belief. If this gives birth to the atheists whom we see to-day, it will not, being only a transitional stage, interfere with our views, but will serve as a warning for those generations which will hearken to our preaching of the religion of Moses, that, by its stable and thoroughly elaborated system has brought all the peoples of the world into subjection to us. Therein we shall emphasize its mystical right, on which, as we shall say, all its educative power is based .... Then at every possible opportunity we shall publish articles in which we shall make comparisons between our beneficent rule and those of past ages. The blessing of tranquility, though it be a tranquility forcibly brought about by centuries of agitation, will throw into higher relief the benefits to which we shall point. The errors of the GOYIM governments will be depicted by us in the most vivid hues. We shall implant such an abhorrence of them that the peoples will prefer tranquility in a state of serfdom to those rights of vaunted freedom which have tortured humanity and exhausted the very sources of human existence, sources which have been exploited by a mob of rascally adventurers who know not what they do .... USELESS CHANGES OF FORMS OF GOVERNMENT TO WHICH WE INSTIGATED THE "GOYIM" WHEN WE WERE UNDERMINING THEIR STATE STRUCTURES, WILL HAVE SO WEARIED THE PEOPLES BY THAT TIME THAT THEY WILL PREFER TO SUFFER ANYTHING UNDER US RATHER THAN RUN THE RISK OF ENDURING AGAIN ALL THE AGITATIONS AND MISERIES THEY HAVE GONE THROUGH.
WE SHALL FORBID CHRIST
2. At the same time we shall not omit to emphasize the historical mistakes of the GOY governments which have tormented humanity for so many centuries by their lack of understanding of everything that constitutes the true good of humanity in their chase after fantastic schemes of social blessings, and have never noticed that these schemes kept on producing a worse and never a better state of the universal relations which are the basis of human life ....
3. The whole force of our principles and methods will lie in the fact that we shall present them and expound them as a splendid contrast to the dead and decomposed old order of things in social life.
4. Our philosophers will discuss all the shortcomings of the various beliefs of the "GOYIM," BUT NO ONE WILL EVER BRING UNDER DISCUSSION OUR FAITH FROM ITS TRUE POINT OF VIEW SINCE THIS WILL BE FULLY LEARNED BY NONE SAVE OURS WHO WILL NEVER DARE TO BETRAY ITS SECRETS.
5. IN COUNTRIES KNOWN AS PROGRESSIVE AND ENLIGHTENED WE HAVE CREATED A SENSELESS, FILTHY, ABOMINABLE LITERATURE. For some time after our entrance to power we shall continue to encourage its existence in order to provide a telling relief by contrast to the speeches, party program, which will be distributed from exalted quarters of ours .... Our wise men, trained to become leaders of the GOYIM, will compose speeches, projects, memoirs, articles, which will be used by us to influence the minds of the GOYIM, directing them towards such understanding and forms of knowledge as have been determined by us.
For many of us Mexican-Americans, it is very scary to know that what is happening in America certainly follows a pattern. The pattern seems to follow the "Protocols". Thank God that we have judges like Ferdinand F. Fernandez who courageously stood up against the other two. Americans as a whole, however, seem to be asleep.
